Bit of electronics for a change, circuits, chips! yummy jummy!...

[Ricky]

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 9:17:57 AM UTC-4, Mike Monett VE3BTI wrote:

Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

fredag den 30. september 2022 kl. 14.06.53 UTC+2 skrev none albert:
In article <tfevrk$10m3u$1...@dont-email.me>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 9 Sep 2022 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
Not really, nuclear can be relatively cheap: France run 75 % of their
\'trickety on nuclear. Allows them to make their own nukes too..
advantage with US threatening to destroy Europe out of fear for
competition.
Where are the private investors? A friend of mine has explained this to
me. All research and then some were paid for by the defence budget in
France, possibly to get sympathy for the nuclear weapons program. The
cheap electricity is a fallacy. If that were true, private investors
flock to nuclear.

long and risky investment

https://youtu.be/UC_BCz0pzMw
Molten Salt Reactors. Invented in America, taken over by China. Can power
the world for thousand of years, very little short-lived radioactive waste,
cannot blow up, walkaway safe, doesn\'t need vast amounts of water for
cooling.

China will own all the patents, will sell the technology to the rest of the
world, including America. A catastrophe in the making.

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment輸lvin Weinberg痴 magnum opus
https://www.ornl.gov/molten-salt-reactor/history

Patents only last 21 years. We will be lucky for the Chinese to have reached the point of selling power plants in 21 years.

--

Rick C.

++-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Ricky]

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 11:13:52 AM UTC-4, John Walliker wrote:

On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 14:36:52 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

Now that US had destroyed all gas pipes to Europe so it can sell there own low quality stuff,
killing their own people with fracking to do it,
I\'m just curious - but why would US methane be of lower quality than
Russian methane? ( I know there will be some other alkanes present
but they are not going to make much difference to its quality as a fuel.)

He\'s being disingenuous, with the comment about fracking. We all know that the US gets their methane from cow flatulence. No fracking required. Or maybe he\'s talking about the fracking the cows do?

--

Rick C.

++-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Ricky]

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 7:10:23 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:

On 30/9/22 23:35, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:06:44 +0200) it happened
albert@cherry.(none) (albert) wrote in
nnd$0c7260ec$1fdb06c2@739bfca3030c89b0>:

In article <tfevrk$10m3u$1...@dont-email.me>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 9 Sep 2022 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Anthony
William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in

Not really, nuclear can be relatively cheap: France run 75 % of their \'trickety on nuclear.
Allows them to make their own nukes too.. advantage with US threatening to destroy Europe
out of fear for competition.

Where are the private investors? A friend of mine has explained this to me.
All research and then some were paid for by the defence budget in France,
possibly to get sympathy for the nuclear weapons program.
The cheap electricity is a fallacy. If that were true, private investors
flock to nuclear.

US has done its best to prevent nuclear energy in Europe taking off

The biggest opposition to nuclear power (though not the most visible) is
the fossil fuel lobby. Backdoor funding to the \"green\" anti-nuclear
movement for decades, who don\'t even realise they\'ve been manipulated.

That\'s actually humorous, anti-nuclear groups who are being manipulated into fighting nuclear plant construction. I guess it doesn\'t take much manipulation to do that. They aren\'t getting much money, that\'s for sure. The power company in Virginia (I forget their name since the last change) was full steam ahead on their combined construction and operating permit (environmental groups be damned!) right up to the point of getting the approval... and getting permission from the state to pass along all the charges to the ratepayers, then they stopped, knowing what it might cost to build the durned thing. A newspaper reported the estimate to be around $18 billion. Yeah, I can see why they are giving a chance to breath before the pour the glass.

--

Rick C.

+++- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+++- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:39:29 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Ricky
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
<5a6af700-6251-4040-977d-fd4efd1a4b84n@googlegroups.com>:

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 8:06:53 AM UTC-4, none albert wrote:
In article <tfevrk$10m3u$1...@dont-email.me>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 9 Sep 2022 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Anthony
William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
Not really, nuclear can be relatively cheap: France run 75 % of their \'trickety on nuclear.
Allows them to make their own nukes too.. advantage with US threatening to destroy Europe
out of fear for competition.
Where are the private investors? A friend of mine has explained this to me.
All research and then some were paid for by the defence budget in France,
possibly to get sympathy for the nuclear weapons program.
The cheap electricity is a fallacy. If that were true, private investors
flock to nuclear.

In the US they won\'t take the risk unless the government guarantees the loans. Nuclear is just not a viable solution ignoring
all the health and safety issues.

Safety from using fossil fuels and breathing the exhaust?
Fear for nuclear comes mainly from the US advertizing the bomb.
Wildlife flourishes in Chernobyl!
Much less people died in that accident than all those who die every year in for example coal mining (thouands)!
Pollution from oil driling in the sea.. Massive fish death end polluted beaches...

 

[Ricky]

On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 2:07:18 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:39:29 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Ricky
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
5a6af700-6251-4040...@googlegroups.com>:
On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 8:06:53 AM UTC-4, none albert wrote:
In article <tfevrk$10m3u$1...@dont-email.me>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 9 Sep 2022 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Anthony
William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
Not really, nuclear can be relatively cheap: France run 75 % of their \'trickety on nuclear.
Allows them to make their own nukes too.. advantage with US threatening to destroy Europe
out of fear for competition.
Where are the private investors? A friend of mine has explained this to me.
All research and then some were paid for by the defence budget in France,
possibly to get sympathy for the nuclear weapons program.
The cheap electricity is a fallacy. If that were true, private investors
flock to nuclear.

In the US they won\'t take the risk unless the government guarantees the loans. Nuclear is just not a viable solution ignoring
all the health and safety issues.
Safety from using fossil fuels and breathing the exhaust?
Fear for nuclear comes mainly from the US advertizing the bomb.
Wildlife flourishes in Chernobyl!
Much less people died in that accident than all those who die every year in for example coal mining (thouands)!
Pollution from oil driling in the sea.. Massive fish death end polluted beaches...

The devil we know...

--

Rick C.

++++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209